Assess Functionalsu and New Right View of the Family Essay

Functionalists trust that the family piss specific or traditional helps within the family. One function of the family would be reproduction or having children as this is imperative for the argona as they will be the future workforce. For region model family businesses will need to settle pot the factories/shops to the next generation in the family for the continuing of the ancestors business. Other functions admit economic principal(prenominal)tenance this is where the family provides necessities for in all the family members for example shelter, food and clothing.Another is that the family helps indoctrinate children how to socialise with others and alike educate them with the correct norms. An important function of the family is that it gives a sense of identity and be for example the family allows stack to be satisfactory to rely on because they atomic number 18 connected through family. Talcott minister of religions is single of the signalise functionalists t hat strongly argued that the nuclear family fits the needs of the contemporary family and so believes that that extended family, which could pertain divorce, will prevent the family from growing and world taken c atomic number 18 of.He corroborateed the traditional functions of the family and spoke active how the modern family is changing a lot of the resileer functions. Parsons identified two remaining functions within the family hotshot creation primary socialisation of girlish which is when the p bents raise the children and educate them about the norms and set for example the rights and wrongs so they atomic number 18 able to pass them one. For example in abusive families negative norms are passed on. However how they act in other ways depend on their civilize sprightliness.The other main function is the stabilisations of adult personalities which is where children turn into adults and are forced to grow up and get a job and buy a house etc. they are made to take t hings to a greater extent seriously in the world so they are able to discover a sense of belonging on their own and actually have a purpose. Overall Parsons view of the family is centred around the middle and upper classes and focuses on the males purpose and ignores the female attitude. This suggests that parsons believes wowork force are happy to be housewives and fathert aspire to be anything else but loyal to their husbands.A a few(prenominal) positive functions of the family is that they are much more than financially stable as the husband and father have a stable job and are able to earn enough money to support the whole family. The nuclear family also results in a much closer relationship among family members as they are with each other daily and so relationships are created. For example siblings are taught to share with each other and so form a bond of trust with each other. Children in the family are more likely to stay on a positive path if they are in a nuclear fami ly as disruption could cause difficulties with school smell and social livelihood.Married parents are seen to be truly best role models when they are part of a nuclear family. However a disadvantage of the nuclear family is that functionalist advertises it so it seems to be very isolated and clandestine and therefore they are seen to have a poor social life sentence because they keep to themselves and dont concern themselves with wider groups of people. The family becomes attached to home leisure with TV the internet and games resulting in them becoming more home-centred. The family makes little march with neighbours and is very self-contained.The family as a result of universe private becomes reliant on support from the welfare state. Alternatively functionalists are said to reckon the family life too much. Therefore ignore the rising divorce rates. They abjure to ack nowledge the negatives about the changing family life, and the growing family diversity. Another view wou ld be those functionalists dont take in account the abuse that female genitalia occur within any families. That is a reason as to wherefore the modern family is changing, its due to the fact that the laws against domestic violence have become much stricter.This executes to the feminists who argued against this nuclear family as it portrayed wo custody in a way that was very sexist. Ronald Fletcher a British sociologist who agreed with the functionalists perspective but argued that modern societies are changing and that there is an increase in modern functions in the family such as regulating sexual behavior and the increase in parental involvement in their education. Other includes the being responsible in the rearing of children and caring for parasitical people whether young or old. All these factors contribute to the changing family life and their morals.More and more people are starting to argue like Fletcher that the nuclear family is the overriding family structure but t hat its modifying over time for example lets are now getting jobs as well as husbands so they both support the house hold and arent dependent on just one person for the whole family. Charles Murray a social scientist says the traditional family life is low threat. His main concern was with the welfare benefits that single women were being abandoned. He thought that it was too easy for them to leave the nuclear family and live completely and just depend on benefits.Murray also argues that being or breathing with a single parent on benefits is giving the wrong role models to children as they are able to see that they can live only when and live off benefits so dont strive to achieve any goals. There are fewer father figures to show objurgate as the mother could lose contain so the children go down a path of drug dealing vandalism and crime which gives a very positive look on the raw(a) right approach. Halsey and Dennis who agrees with what Murray argues motto that single par enthood and absent fathers is one of the key issues with the decrease in nuclear family lives.Due to the lack of jobs and rise in unemployment men are starting to struggle to maintain their title of bread winners and the industries are changing from heavy workloads so women are more likely to find a job in modern clock. As a result men may be reject by the women as they cant financially depend on them so would rather be given benefits than struggle to keep a roof over them and their childrens fountainheads. Halsey debates that being in a one parent family with the factors of unemployment and poverty being high could inevitably lead to crime and vandalism by the younger members of the family.Against a nuclear family with a stable income and stable household would again lead to any crimes and vandalism by the offspring in the family. Abbott and Wallaces critically judge the new right about how women are being apply in the families and how a lot of frustration and unhappiness is ab le to be experienced by living in this environment. The new right also disagrees to acknowledge the violence that can be cause in a nuclear family life and the abuse a family can actually admit from being forced to stay and live with them as it isnt socially acceptable to be a one parent family. round of the ideas that Abbott and Wallace criticised are that the new right are opposed to having an easy availability to a divorce this again goes against women having the right to leave a violent family life and actually possibly saving theirs and their childrens lives by leaving. Again the new right disagrees with abortions as they say the foetuses have a right to life but Abbott and Wallace criticise this because bringing a baby into the world is a big thing and some people are unable to mission for the baby correctly.The new right makes men have a very stressful life as they have a whole family dependent on them as a role model of a breadwinner and the alike(p) with women being role models for the girls and showing how much work goes into being entangled in a family. Abbott and Wallace favour letting people take control of their own lives by living alone or being winding in a homosexual relationship or even women being the breadwinners while men are in charge of the household and children.Some of the traditional family values that the new right followers agree on bringing back involve that a womans infinite is in the home and shouldnt be working as a bread winner as thats the mans job as head of the household. This is associated with gender patriarchy as women are treated completely variant to the way men are, and so its seen as unfair and sexist in the modern day. Gender patriarchy would be one of the main factors that feminists would argue about as they say women are oppressed by the nuclear family and its rules and values.Different feminist groups argue about different factors, all-encompassing feminist argue about sex discrimination and want changes i n the law to be made. However radical feminists argue against men patriarchy, where men are seen to have more power for example women are considered to be responsible for raising the children and choosing and cooking the food and keeping the home as welcoming as possible. Traditionally a man would never be seen do to the cooking or cleaning as it was seen as a wifes job but in modern times its a much more equal task.There are however some positive aspects as to why more people agree with the new rights theory as Brigitte Berger, who defends the nuclear family by say its a very positive feature of modern societies as it helps the youth of the world understand decency, common sense, politeness and respect for others. These values and morals will help make a better life for the person as common decency is seen as a norm and many people agree that in a single parent family the mother might find it s a struggle to teach the children all of that on her own due to the lack of help from t he father figure.