The Boston Tea Party

The capital of mamma afternoon tea companionship was a significant event in the years leading up to the American Revolution. By 1773 tensions were mounting as British Americas traffichip with set about England became increasing strained. The British empire has secured advantage in the french and Indian Wars barely had run up an incredible war debt. male monarch George III and the British presidential term looked to tasking goods in the American colonies as a means to replenish its treasury. It was in this the passing of the tea correspond 1773 that ignited a standoff and brought the issue of revenue without representation in Parliament to head.As a result, the colonists took fermention and began oert revolt to British rule in the Americas (capital of Massachusetts tea political party Historical Society). This paper will seek the disasters that led up to the Boston tea c wholeer and its impact on succeeding events leading up to the American Revolution. The misfo rtune that has been termed the Boston teatime company occurred on December 16, 1773, when authorities officials in Boston refused to return three shiploads of taxed-imposed tea to Britain. A group of colonists boarded the ships in disguise and ruined the tea by throwing it into Boston shield (BTPHS).The Tea figure of 1773 essenti eithery everyowed champion of Britains greatest commercial interests of the day, The eastward India Company, a monopoly over tea imports to all British colonies. Due to increased competitor from the Dutch and the already high tax the roof placed on tea, the atomic number 99 India Company had a surplus of tea. The declaration that King George III and Parliament came up with was to force this tea on the habituation (Knollenberg 93). Basically, a captive market was created for British products by the British Government. There was business concern amongst the colonists that this could extend to products other(a) than tea.The colonists motions and the government chemical reaction widened an already growing chasm betwixt Crown and colonists (Larabee 106). During the years of 1754 through 1763, the British Empire was involved in The french and Indian War, a protracted conflict with tinge strength France for control of settlements in America. The French allied themselves with Native American tribes to loose the colonies of the British. At the end of this conflict, Britain was successful in securing the conquest of Canada. During this period of time, the thirteen American colonies flourished and grew ncreasingly less dependent on long Britain. With the need to re-establish control over the Colonies and keep back their war costs, Parliament passed a serial publication of acts to which did nonhing but agitate the already frustrated colonists and further strain relations between the Crown and the Colonies (Cave 2004). There were 2 major actions by Parliament that exacerbated the already strained relationship with the Coloni es. First, the Stamp mould of 1765 met with significant compound resistance. This act require that printed material in the colonies carry a tax stamp.These printed materials included legal documents, magazines, newspapers and other types of paper frequently used end-to-end the colonies (Goldfield 144). Second, Parliament passed the Townshend Acts. These five Acts has the purpose to exalt revenue in the colonies to pay the salaries of governors and adjudicate so that they would be independent of colonial control, to create a more powerful means of enforcing compliance with trade regulations, to penalize the province of New York for failing to abide by with the 1765 Quartering Act, and to establish the precedent that the British Parliament had the right to tax the colonies (Larabee 32-33).Both items created choler and highlighted the issue of revenue enhancement without representation. The Boston Tea Party event was not a singular incident and it had very weensy to do with the tea itself. The tea dispatch became a sticking point between the British and the colonists as it was the taxation on the tea that was objectionable. The core issue of creation taxed without having fair legislative say in the government had been a recurring infrastructure in the years leading up to 1773. When the Boston Tea Party incident took place, the more militant colonists entangle they had no other options available to them.Previous complaints or entreaties to Parliament, tiptop Minister Lord North, or King George III went without resolution (Alexander 126). As such(prenominal) they took matters into their own hands. American Patriot Samuel Adams argued at the time that the incident was not the act of a lawless mob, but kinda a protest based on principle. The colonists felt up their rights were eroding and were moved to action (Alexander 129). The fallout from the Boston Tea Party was severe and greatly impacted the parsimony of Boston. Authorities in Britain and t he colonies were outraged and felt that this action could not go unpunished.A serial of acts were passed by Parliament in 1774 that were to absorbher with called the absolute Acts. The Boston Port Act closed the Port of Boston as punishment until the destroyed tea was pay for in full and the king was slaked that Boston was firmly under British control. This created animosity as it affected all of Boston, regardless of connection with the Boston Tea Party and did not allow for a defense to be given against the charges. The mom Government Act took away the colonists talent to select their own local officials.All members of the colonial government had to be appointed by the governor or king. This reverberated throughout the colonies as it was feared that such a thing could guide elsewhere (Ammerman 9-10). The Administration of Justice Act allowed the governor to move trials of accused regal officials to another colony or to gigantic Britain if he believed the official could no t get a fair trial in mommy. Although the act stipulated that witnesses would be paid for their belong expenses, in practice few colonists could submit to to leave their work and travel to England to take the stand in a trial.There was also on that point fear that British officials could harass American colonists and escape justice. The Quartering Act use to all of the colonies, and sought to create a more effective method of caparison British troops in America. Previously, the colonies had been requisite to provide housing for soldiers. However, colonial legislatures had not been cooperative. Here under this act the governor was allowed to house soldiers in other buildings if satisfactory quarters were not provided (Ammerman 10). The Coercive Acts did not have the desired effect.The British felt that these acts would isolate radicals in the colonies and push the American colonists to concede the authority of Parliament over their own elected governments. Great Britain misca lculated how these would be taken and soon learned that savage nature of these acts galvanized support against Parliament. Many viewed the Coercive Acts as a violation of their perfect rights, their natural rights, and their colonial charters. They therefore viewed the acts as a threat to the liberties of all of British America, not just Massachusetts.The acts promoted sympathy for Massachusetts and encouraged colonists from the otherwise diverse colonies to invent the First Continental sexual congress. The Continental Congress created the Continental Association, an agreement to boycott British goods and, if that did not get the Coercive Acts reverse after a year, to stop exporting goods to Great Britain as well. The Congress whence also pledged to support Massachusetts in case of attack. Which of course meant that all of the colonies would be drawn into the American subversive War began at Lexington and Concord (Ammerman 15).Over time, the Boston Tea Party has become syno nymic with unfair taxation and the guy of government overstepping its boundaries. In 1773 Boston, the seeds of the American Revolution were being sewn. Through miscalculation and sheer abuse of the colonial system, Britain strengthened support for a growing movement toward independence. The Boston Tea Party then became more than a principled protest action against taxation it became an event that demonstrated that a power cannot sustain rule with consent of the governed. The governed in this case, went on to fight and die for their rights. For the British government, its shortsightedness brought about its own capitulation in this case.Works Cited Alexander, John K. Samuel Adams Americas Revolutionary Politician. Lanham, mendelevium Rowman Littlefield, 2002. Print. Ammerman, David. In the Common Cause American Response to the Coercive Acts of 1774. New York Norton, 1974. Print. Cave, Alfred A. The French and Indian War. Westport, Connecticut Greenwood Press, 2004. Web. 12 Febru ary 2010. Knollenberg, Bernhard. harvest-time of the American Revolution, 17661775. New York Free Press, 1975. Print. Labaree, benjamin Woods. The Boston Tea Party. Originally make 1964. Boston Northeastern University Press, 1979. Print. What Was the Boston Tea Party? Boston Tea Party Historical Society. 2008. Web. 12 February 2010. Goldfield, David R. , Dejohn-Anderson, Virginia and Abbot, Carl. The American tour a history of the United States. upper berth Saddle River, New Jersey apprentice Hall, 2009. Print. Young, Alfred F. The Shoemaker and the Tea Party retrospect and the American Revolution. Boston Beacon Press, 1999. Print.