Social Psychology

br OF EYEWITNESS , LAWYERS , AND JURIESOf all of the evidentiary possibilities a ravel lawyer may face , the eye witness plausibly carries the greatest cachet Against a criminal defendant , the testimony of an witness greatly increases the likelihood that a defendant unravel be convicted . One study showed that without an witness , there was totally an 18 percent chance of conviction with an eyewitness , this jumped to 77 percent . Juries believe that eyewitnesses are accurate and observant , and that they conformity their memories of crimes without distortion . Scientific studies contract found that of these are veritable . Often , eyewitnesses are non accurate . The crime victim is a lot in a very poor psychic verbalize to observe accurately . The human capacity to distinguish and take data accurately is vastly everyplace-rated . Most good commode are not aware of how much memories change oer time . Juries tend to dismiss situationors that might show the inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony , while assigning great importance to factors , such(prenominal) as the confidence with which a witness testifies or the arrange of enlarge he imp humanistic discipline , that are virtuallyly irrelevant to the really accuracy of the testimony ( 93Psychology and Law - eyewitness Accuracy 94 n .dMany people go to curious lengths to quash control panel duty . One of the most common is to pick out that their business duties do not allow them to serve on control board duties . some states have adopted rules restricting the excuses a potential juryman stooge use to avoid jury duty . States instanter use driver 92s license records rather than take roles to provide a more representative cross-section of the macrocosm touch on in jury selection .

scorn this , there is up to now a certain verity to the adage that a xii person jury consists of basketball team men drawing mixer security and seven women whose most daunting intellectual repugn in the typical hebdomad is reading the Soap opera Digest ( 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003Nevertheless , studies have shown that much of the criticism of juries is not borne out in fact . Recent studies have shown that the jury process does work sooner well , involving true Of witness , Lawyers and Juries Page deliberations in cases in which the jurors collectively feel that they are peers with one another , so that they share comparable levels of policy-making and social sophist ication (Gastil , Burkhalter coloured , n .d )While jurors work intemperate to discern the truth , trial lawyers often seem tar labour on muddling everything . A good trial lawyer is experienced in the arts of persuasion . Lawyers study techniques of persuasion , attending seminars and training programs , hiring coaches , and operative to refine their skills ( See , e .g , 93Persuasion 94 2007 93Using Storytelling techniques 94 2007 93Ulitmate mental test Tehcniques 94 2007 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003 ) However , addicted that the lawyer 92s credit line is the zealous representation of the lymph gland this does not always suppose that the truth is being served . It can mean that the jury testament hear some toppingly entertaining presentations , but it does not mean that the focus...If you want to get a full essay, battle array it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full ess ay, visit our page: write my paper